Choosing the most economically advantageous tender using a multi-criteria decision analysis approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose and test a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach based on an additive value function (AVF) select the most economically advantageous tender under European Union public procurement regulations. Design/methodology/approach A case study in which AVF evaluation model constructed by personnel results original, real-life are compared those discovered MCDA approach. Findings captures preferences authority more reliable transparent manner than commonly used models scoring formulas. Practical implications While procurement, relative formulas can neither present unit accurately nor do they enable bidders draft bids according these preferences. proposed achieve both. Originality/value contribution threefold. First, successful construction with introduced. Second, actual, case. Third, thoughtful comparison features, structures using presented.
منابع مشابه
Choosing the best method for targeting of subsidies using fuzzy multi-criteria decision
The subsidy is one of the most important economic tools and the government’s supportive policies for the protection of low-income groups. The inefficiency of the subsidy distribution puts a heavy cost burden on the government and also create injustice. Subsidies are aimed to achieve social justice, welfare, and fair income distribution. Therefore, the necessity of paying subsidies and support f...
متن کاملPrioritizing Rangeland Improvement Practices using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
Selecting the appropriate rangeland improvement method is a challenging task for range managers because it requires consideration of various criteria. This study was aimed to evaluate various restoration and reclamation practices in the rangelands of Semirom-Isfahan using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Grazing management, water point development, pit seeding, exclosure, water ...
متن کاملA Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Location Selection in the Niger Delta Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach
Making an informed decision with regards to a suitable business location or site selection for organizations is becoming challenging for business decision makers globally; and even more challenging in business environment that are saddled with uncertainties. The continues raise of multiple criteria variation of site preferences has also necessitated the application of advanced decision making t...
متن کاملEvaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کاملAnalysis of Customer's Expectations and Satisfaction in the Zanjan Municipality Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (FMCDM) Approach
Customer satisfaction is the most important step in the process of identifying customer expectations. Identify customer expectations ‎without referring to him and get his view, is impossible. In order to identify customer expectations, service suppliers are also using ‎statistical techniques, surveyed their customers. According to the studies, there is no appropriate framework for expectati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Public Procurement
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2150-6930', '1535-0118']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-06-2021-0040